[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"branding":3,"analytics":7,"section-reviews":10,"sections":482},{"siteName":4,"siteTagline":5,"publisherName":4,"contactEmail":6},"The Revision","Tech news, decoded.","editor@therevision.news",{"gaMeasurementId":8,"adsenseClientId":9},"G-ZW2MV82GYR","ca-pub-8533917693782264",{"section":11,"sections":16,"articles":81},{"name":12,"slug":13,"count":14,"latest_published_at":15},"Reviews","reviews",20,"2026-06-24T12:00:01.000Z",[17,22,27,32,37,42,47,52,57,62,67,71,76],{"name":18,"slug":19,"count":20,"latest_published_at":21},"AI","ai",2590,"2026-07-16T04:00:00.000Z",{"name":23,"slug":24,"count":25,"latest_published_at":26},"Security","security",294,"2026-07-15T19:59:48.000Z",{"name":28,"slug":29,"count":30,"latest_published_at":31},"Deals","deals",179,"2026-06-29T20:02:07.000Z",{"name":33,"slug":34,"count":35,"latest_published_at":36},"Policy","policy",158,"2026-07-16T00:02:48.000Z",{"name":38,"slug":39,"count":40,"latest_published_at":41},"Hardware","hardware",122,"2026-07-14T19:46:26.000Z",{"name":43,"slug":44,"count":45,"latest_published_at":46},"Consumer Tech","consumer-tech",93,"2026-07-13T13:20:48.000Z",{"name":48,"slug":49,"count":50,"latest_published_at":51},"Software","software",70,"2026-07-13T19:52:25.000Z",{"name":53,"slug":54,"count":55,"latest_published_at":56},"Science","science",66,"2026-07-10T10:29:37.000Z",{"name":58,"slug":59,"count":60,"latest_published_at":61},"Dev Tools","dev-tools",59,"2026-07-07T04:00:00.000Z",{"name":63,"slug":64,"count":65,"latest_published_at":66},"Gaming","gaming",41,"2026-07-09T04:00:00.000Z",{"name":68,"slug":69,"count":65,"latest_published_at":70},"Startups","startups","2026-06-29T20:55:50.000Z",{"name":72,"slug":73,"count":74,"latest_published_at":75},"General","general",29,"2026-07-10T22:28:58.000Z",{"name":77,"slug":78,"count":79,"latest_published_at":80},"How-To","how-to",6,"2026-06-16T09:00:00.000Z",[82,112,134,155,177,197,218,238,258,278,298,317,338,358,376,393,411,430,449,467],{"id":83,"slug":84,"title":85,"dek":86,"body_md":87,"tags_json":88,"published_at":15,"created_at":89,"updated_at":90,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":93,"image_url":92,"persona_id":92,"persona_name":92,"section":13,"tags":104,"sources":107,"feedback":111,"feedback_at":92,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},2118,"star-fox-switch-2-review-third-times-the-charm","Star Fox Switch 2 Review: Third Time's the Charm","Nintendo and Velan Studios remake Star Fox 64 for the third time, and despite the corporate cynicism baked into its existence, the game mostly works.","Nintendo remade Star Fox 64 again, and somehow it's worth playing.\n\nStar Fox for Switch 2 is a one-to-one recreation of the 1997 N64 rail shooter in terms of level design, enemy placement, and mechanics — right down to a campaign you can finish in roughly 30 minutes. Nintendo developed it alongside Velan Studios, a Troy, New York outfit, and timed the release to coincide with Fox McCloud's appearance in the Super Mario Galaxy Movie. The new version re-records the entire orchestral score with live musicians, overhauls the visuals, adds mission briefing cutscenes between levels, and introduces two new modes: Challenge Mode and an online multiplayer Battle Mode.\n\nWhat makes this more than a cynical cash-in is how well the core game holds up when you dress it properly. The original Star Fox 64 was cinematic by design — rail shooters script the action, so the genre rewards a Hollywood presentation — and the live orchestra plus reactive environments deliver that in ways the N64's sound hardware never could. That's a genuine argument for remaking something rather than just re-releasing it, and it's rarer than it should be.\n\nThe new voice acting trades the original's dramatic line readings for a more subdued modern register — a fair trade for new players, a jarring one for anyone who has had \"DO A BARREL ROLL\" burned into their memory for 30 years. Battle Mode, meanwhile, ships with only three maps and no announced roadmap for more content, which gives it a short shelf-life ceiling. Neither flaw kills the package, but both are the kind of corners Nintendo tends to cut when a remake is primarily serving as franchise marketing ahead of something bigger.","[\"gaming\",\"nintendo\",\"reviews\",\"switch 2\"]","2026-06-24T12:55:27.779Z","2026-06-24T12:55:33.255Z","published",null,[94,100],{"id":95,"reviewer":96,"round":97,"reason":98,"status":99},"editor-r1","editor",1,"The dek attributes the rebuild entirely to Velan Studios and Nintendo, but the source establishes it's a Nintendo-published title developed with Velan as partner — more importantly, the dek and body both claim the new voice acting 'works' or is a 'genuine upgrade' framing that contradicts the body's own criticism that it 'sands off some of the theatrical weirdness'; additionally, the article asserts Battle Mode will 'feel thin within a month' as original analysis but the source says 'a week or t","resolved",{"id":101,"reviewer":96,"round":102,"reason":103,"status":99},"editor-r2",2,"The closing paragraph's claim that the campaign 'wraps in about 30 minutes' is accurate per the source, but the article's final paragraph buries three distinct criticisms (voice acting, Battle Mode map count, campaign length) in a single undifferentiated sentence with no transition from the preceding strategic-context paragraph — restructure so the criticism and the context read as distinct sections rather than a collapsed list tacked onto a forward-looking take.",[64,105,13,106],"nintendo","switch 2",[108],{"name":109,"url":110},"Mashable","https:\u002F\u002Fmashable.com\u002Fentertainment\u002Fstar-fox-nintendo-switch-2-review",0,{"id":113,"slug":114,"title":115,"dek":116,"body_md":117,"tags_json":118,"published_at":119,"created_at":120,"updated_at":121,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":122,"image_url":125,"persona_id":92,"persona_name":92,"section":13,"tags":126,"sources":130,"feedback":111,"feedback_at":92,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},904,"yale-linus-l2-lite-offers-matter-support-without-a-subscription","Yale Linus L2 Lite Skips the Subscription, Keeps the Rough Edges","Yale's Linus L2 Lite brings Matter compatibility and zero subscription fees to renters, but a clunky setup dims an otherwise solid value proposition.","Yale's new renter-friendly smart lock supports the Matter protocol and charges no monthly fee. That combination is rarer than it should be.\n\nYale has released the Linus Smart Lock L2 Lite, a deadbolt replacement aimed at renters who want smart home integration without landlord-hostile drilling or ongoing subscription costs. The lock supports Matter, the cross-platform standard backed by Apple, Google, Amazon, and the major platform holders, which means it can connect to HomeKit, Google Home, Alexa, and other ecosystems without a proprietary hub. It sits at the affordable end of Yale's Linus lineup. The rough-edges caveat is real: getting it running requires more patience with the instruction manual than a product at this price point should demand.\n\nThe no-subscription angle matters in a market where rivals routinely charge monthly fees just to unlock remote-access features that cost the manufacturer almost nothing to provide. For renters specifically, Matter support is a compounding benefit: move to a new apartment, reconnect to a different platform, and nothing breaks. That portability has been the theoretical promise of Matter since the standard launched in 2022, and a budget lock that actually delivers it is a real test of whether the promise holds in practice.\n\n\"Works with Matter\" and \"works well with Matter\" remain meaningfully different things in 2026, and the setup friction here suggests the gap has not fully closed.","[\"smart home\",\"matter\",\"smart locks\",\"consumer-tech\"]","2026-06-14T08:00:00.000Z","2026-06-14T08:27:32.148Z","2026-06-18T12:50:44.117Z",[123],{"id":95,"reviewer":96,"round":97,"reason":124,"status":99},"Add a brief concluding paragraph that recaps the key points and indicates who should consider buying the lock.","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.xyz.onl\u002Farticle-images\u002Fyale-linus-l2-lite-offers-matter-support-without-a-subscription.webp",[127,128,129,44],"smart home","matter","smart locks",[131],{"name":132,"url":133},"TechRadar","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.techradar.com\u002Fhome\u002Fhome-security\u002Fthe-yale-linus-smart-lock-l2-lite-is-a-clever-affordable-matter-lock-with-no-subscription-fee-but-a-few-rough-edges",{"id":135,"slug":136,"title":137,"dek":138,"body_md":139,"tags_json":140,"published_at":141,"created_at":142,"updated_at":143,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":144,"image_url":145,"persona_id":92,"persona_name":92,"section":13,"tags":146,"sources":151,"feedback":111,"feedback_at":92,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},820,"protoarc-em25-ergonomic-mouse-falls-short-of-logitechs-mx-master","ProtoArc EM25 Gets the MX Master Shape Right, Little Else","At $50, this wireless ergonomic mouse checks every MX Master box on paper and misses nearly all of them in practice.","ProtoArc's EM25 is a $50 wireless ergonomic mouse built to look like a Logitech MX Master and priced to undercut one.\n\nThe EM25 checks the visible boxes: ergonomic chassis, extended thumb rest, dual scroll wheels with a clutch on one, and quiet main clicks. The problem surfaces the moment you start using it. Secondary buttons feel awkward, the scroll wheels lack refinement, and the mouse skates (the plastic feet underneath) feel rough enough to drag against the desk rather than glide across it. The chassis has real structural solidity, which keeps the EM25 from being completely dismissible, but the gap between \"has these features\" and \"executes them well\" is significant.\n\nLogitech's MX Master 3S runs around $100, so the pitch for a $50 alternative addresses real demand. The problem is that at that price, you're also competing with well-built standard mice from established brands, none of which need an ergonomic form factor to justify themselves, and most of which feel far more considered than this. If you need the specific shape for comfort reasons and truly cannot wait to save up, the EM25 has something to offer; otherwise, the money goes further elsewhere.\n\nThe EM25 is a useful reminder that cloning a product's silhouette is the easy part; the reason people pay for the original is everything the spec sheet doesn't capture.","[\"ergonomic-mouse\",\"hardware-review\",\"budget-peripherals\",\"wireless-mouse\"]","2026-06-12T16:31:51.000Z","2026-06-12T17:17:24.157Z","2026-06-18T12:09:52.396Z",[],"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.xyz.onl\u002Farticle-images\u002Fprotoarc-em25-ergonomic-mouse-falls-short-of-logitechs-mx-master.webp",[147,148,149,150],"ergonomic-mouse","hardware-review","budget-peripherals","wireless-mouse",[152],{"name":153,"url":154},"PCGamer","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.pcgamer.com\u002Fhardware\u002Fgaming-mice\u002Fprotoarc-em25-ergonomic-mouse-review\u002F",{"id":156,"slug":157,"title":158,"dek":159,"body_md":160,"tags_json":161,"published_at":162,"created_at":163,"updated_at":164,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":165,"image_url":166,"persona_id":167,"persona_name":168,"section":13,"tags":169,"sources":173,"feedback":111,"feedback_at":92,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},575,"benq-launches-a-32-inch-4k-mac-monitor-with-120hz-for-830","BenQ MA320UG: 32-inch 4K at $830 vs Apple's $1,599 Studio Display","BenQ's new 32-inch Mac-focused monitor adds 120Hz and a fully adjustable stand at roughly half the price of Apple's own display.","BenQ's MA320UG lands as the only 32-inch display in the company's Mac-targeted lineup, and its $830 price tag is the most obvious thing about it.\n\nThe MA320UG is a 32-inch IPS panel running 3840x2160 at up to 120Hz variable refresh rate, with 600 nits brightness and a 1300:1 contrast ratio. It connects via Thunderbolt 4 or USB-C, charges a MacBook at up to 96W through the primary Thunderbolt port, and includes a hub with USB-A, a downstream USB-C, and a headphone jack. The stand adjusts for height, tilt, swivel, and pivot - a meaningful contrast to Apple's Studio Display, where a tilt-and-height stand costs an extra $400. There is no webcam, and the glossy Nano Gloss panel has no matte alternative at this size.\n\nThe price gap is hard to ignore: the Apple Studio Display starts at $1,599 for a 27-inch 5K panel with a stand that only tilts. At $830, you could buy two MA320UGs for less than one Studio Display with a useful stand. For most office and creative workflows, 4K at 120Hz is more than adequate - it is only in high-end production contexts, where pixel density visibly matters, that the Studio Display's 5K edge becomes a real argument.\n\nApple has not released a 32-inch display and shows no public sign of doing so, which means BenQ is not competing against an Apple product so much as filling a gap Apple has chosen to leave open - and charging accordingly little for the privilege.","[\"monitors\",\"mac\",\"hardware\",\"apple\"]","2026-06-10T11:15:00.000Z","2026-06-10T12:24:18.825Z","2026-06-18T08:55:16.461Z",[],"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.xyz.onl\u002Farticle-images\u002Fbenq-launches-a-32-inch-4k-mac-monitor-with-120hz-for-830.webp","apple-fanboy","Apple Fanboy",[170,171,39,172],"monitors","mac","apple",[174],{"name":175,"url":176},"Macworld","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.macworld.com\u002Farticle\u002F3157025\u002Fbenq-ma320ug-review.html",{"id":178,"slug":179,"title":180,"dek":181,"body_md":182,"tags_json":183,"published_at":184,"created_at":185,"updated_at":186,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":187,"image_url":188,"persona_id":92,"persona_name":92,"section":13,"tags":189,"sources":193,"feedback":111,"feedback_at":92,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},364,"dell-revives-the-xps-14-with-13th-gen-ultra-chips-and-upgraded-specs","Dell's XPS 14 Is Back and Nearly Worth the Price","The 2026 XPS 14 delivers a physical function row, better speakers, and remarkable battery life, though Dell's pricing remains as aggressive as ever.","Dell's 2026 XPS 14 is a genuine recovery for a laptop line that had been written off.\n\nThe new XPS 14 runs Intel's Core Ultra Series 3 \"Panther Lake\" chips and restores a physical function row that recent models abandoned. Battery life is reportedly remarkable, speakers are improved, and the build quality is exceptional for how thin the machine is. Dell also retired its \"Premium Plus\" tier naming, a move that generated no apparent grief.\n\nLast year's XPS 13 was treated by reviewers as the line's probable last gasp, a model that had lost its way against rivals from Apple and Lenovo. A turnaround matters because XPS was once Dell's strongest argument that Windows hardware could compete on design and build quality. If the 2026 model delivers what early reviews suggest, it gives premium Windows buyers a credible option in a segment Apple has dominated for years.\n\nThe catch, as ever with Dell's premium tier, is price. A score of 7 is genuine praise from a publication that does not hand out perfect scores freely. But expensive for what you get has followed the XPS line for years, and nothing here suggests that has changed.","[\"dell\",\"laptops\",\"intel\",\"hardware\"]","2026-06-07T14:00:00.000Z","2026-06-07T14:09:57.239Z","2026-06-18T05:43:28.806Z",[],"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.xyz.onl\u002Farticle-images\u002Fdell-revives-the-xps-14-with-13th-gen-ultra-chips-and-upgraded-specs.webp",[190,191,192,39],"dell","laptops","intel",[194],{"name":195,"url":196},"The Verge","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.theverge.com\u002Ftech\u002F944360\u002Fdell-xps-14-2026-review",{"id":198,"slug":199,"title":200,"dek":201,"body_md":202,"tags_json":203,"published_at":204,"created_at":205,"updated_at":206,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":207,"image_url":208,"persona_id":92,"persona_name":92,"section":13,"tags":209,"sources":214,"feedback":111,"feedback_at":92,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},362,"red-light-devices-show-modest-hair-regrowth-after-16-weeks","Red-Light Therapy Devices Actually Grew Hair in a 16-Week Test","After 16 weeks of daily use, structured testing found visible hair regrowth with red-light therapy devices, though the compliance required is steep.","Red-light therapy devices can visibly regrow hair - if you commit to daily use for four months.\n\nA structured test running 16 weeks tracked daily results across several red-light devices designed for hair restoration. By the end, testers saw visible regrowth. The devices work on the principle of low-level laser therapy, which has FDA clearance for hair loss - though the clinical literature on efficacy is considerably thinner than the marketing suggests.\n\nConsumer red-light therapy for hair has moved well past its biohacker origins into a mainstream product category, and most coverage amounts to a few weeks of impressions. Four months of structured daily testing is more rigorous than the typical gadget review, which gives these findings more weight.\n\n\"Visible regrowth\" after 16 weeks of daily compliance is a real finding - but it doesn't tell you whether these devices outperform minoxidil, which costs a fraction of the price and has decades of independent clinical data behind it. The best argument for these gadgets is convenience; the honest caveat is that four months of daily effort is a long time to wait for a result you could measure against a much cheaper baseline.","[\"red light therapy\",\"hair loss\",\"health tech\",\"consumer devices\"]","2026-06-07T10:02:00.000Z","2026-06-07T10:09:49.855Z","2026-06-18T05:42:07.963Z",[],"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.xyz.onl\u002Farticle-images\u002Fred-light-devices-show-modest-hair-regrowth-after-16-weeks.webp",[210,211,212,213],"red light therapy","hair loss","health tech","consumer devices",[215],{"name":216,"url":217},"Wired","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.wired.com\u002Fstory\u002Fbest-red-light-therapy-for-hair-growth\u002F",{"id":219,"slug":220,"title":221,"dek":222,"body_md":223,"tags_json":224,"published_at":225,"created_at":226,"updated_at":227,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":228,"image_url":229,"persona_id":92,"persona_name":92,"section":13,"tags":230,"sources":235,"feedback":111,"feedback_at":92,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},359,"jmgo-n3-ultimate-delivers-portable-4k-performance-at-2399","JMGO Knocks Anker Off the Portable 4K Projector Throne","After weeks of real-world testing, the $2,399 N3 Ultimate wins on placement flexibility and ambient light performance — not just raw specs.","JMGO's N3 Ultimate has displaced Anker as the top portable 4K projector on the market, at least by one reviewer's reckoning after extended hands-on use.\n\nThe N3 Ultimate runs Google TV and is built to handle placement angles that would trip up most rivals — set it on a coffee table, a campsite rock, or anywhere off-axis and it hunts for a surface and corrects. It holds against moderate ambient light even at those steep angles, and after dark it can reportedly keep pace with home theater setups that cost considerably more. Current street price is $2,399, a $500 discount from the $2,999 list price.\n\nPortable projectors have quietly closed the gap on fixed installations over the past few years, and Google TV integration is a big part of why. Auto-keystone, auto-focus, and improving light engines mean the setup friction that made these devices a compromise purchase has largely evaporated. The N3 Ultimate seems to represent where that trajectory currently lands.\n\nStill, $2,399 is real money — and anyone weighing this against a quality OLED should run those numbers before assuming a projector is the flexible option.","[\"projector\",\"4k\",\"home theater\",\"google tv\"]","2026-06-07T07:00:00.000Z","2026-06-07T07:08:38.085Z","2026-06-18T05:38:29.181Z",[],"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.xyz.onl\u002Farticle-images\u002Fjmgo-n3-ultimate-delivers-portable-4k-performance-at-2399.webp",[231,232,233,234],"projector","4k","home theater","google tv",[236],{"name":195,"url":237},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.theverge.com\u002Freviews\u002F943732\u002Fbest-portable-4k-projector-review",{"id":239,"slug":240,"title":241,"dek":242,"body_md":243,"tags_json":244,"published_at":245,"created_at":246,"updated_at":247,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":248,"image_url":249,"persona_id":167,"persona_name":168,"section":13,"tags":250,"sources":252,"feedback":111,"feedback_at":92,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},350,"benq-launches-glossy-27-inch-5k-monitor-aimed-at-mac-users","BenQ's 27-Inch 5K Monitor Bets on Gloss in a Matte World","The MA270S targets Mac users who want a glossy, high-resolution external display, a combination Apple has largely kept to itself.","BenQ's new MA270S is a 27-inch 5K external monitor with a glossy screen, a finish Apple ships on every display it makes but one that's rare in the third-party monitor market.\n\nThe MA270S sits at the top of BenQ's Mac-oriented lineup, matching the 5K resolution Apple uses on its Studio Display. Matte coatings have dominated the external monitor business for years, pushed by practical concerns about office glare. BenQ is deliberately going the other way, shipping a panel surface that matches what Mac users already see on their laptops and Apple-branded screens. The company frames the MA270S explicitly as a Studio Display rival.\n\nThe glossy-versus-matte choice has real image-quality consequences: matte coatings scatter light and can mute color saturation, while glossy panels render contrast and color more cleanly. That gap matters most to photographers and video editors, and it's exactly the audience Apple's own display targets. Mac users who've wanted a third-party 5K glossy option have had almost nowhere to turn until now.\n\nBenQ has a solid track record with Mac-friendly monitors, but a matching finish is the easy part. How the MA270S holds up on color accuracy, brightness, and built-in features like speakers and webcam quality is the harder comparison that will determine whether it actually belongs in the same conversation as Apple's display.","[\"hardware\",\"monitors\",\"mac\",\"displays\"]","2026-06-06T17:41:00.000Z","2026-06-06T18:10:24.088Z","2026-06-18T05:30:25.110Z",[],"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.xyz.onl\u002Farticle-images\u002Fbenq-launches-glossy-27-inch-5k-monitor-aimed-at-mac-users.webp",[39,170,171,251],"displays",[253,256],{"name":254,"url":255},"9to5Mac","https:\u002F\u002F9to5mac.com\u002F2026\u002F06\u002F06\u002Fbenq-ma270s-hands-on-for-mac-studio-display-competitor-27-inch-5k-monitor\u002F",{"name":132,"url":257},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.techradar.com\u002Fcomputing\u002Fmonitors\u002Fbenq-ma270s-review",{"id":259,"slug":260,"title":261,"dek":262,"body_md":263,"tags_json":264,"published_at":265,"created_at":266,"updated_at":267,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":268,"image_url":92,"persona_id":92,"persona_name":92,"section":13,"tags":269,"sources":274,"feedback":111,"feedback_at":92,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},290,"oura-ring-5-trims-size-holds-price-at-399","Oura's New Smart Ring Is 40% Smaller, Still Starts at $399","Oura claims the Ring 5 is the world's smallest smart ring, cut 40% from the previous model and priced from $399 in an increasingly crowded category.","Oura's fifth smart ring is 40% smaller than its predecessor, and at $399, it still commands a premium.\n\nOura released the Ring 5, calling it the world's smallest smart ring. The shrink is real: 40% smaller than the previous model means a noticeably slimmer profile on your finger. The device starts at $399. Whether the hardware justifies that number depends on what sensors and software Oura packed into the space it reclaimed.\n\nSize matters in smart rings more than in almost any other wearable category. People abandon rings that are uncomfortable, and the category's edge over smartwatches is exactly that you forget you're wearing it. Oura now faces Samsung's Galaxy Ring, which means \"world's smallest\" is doing real marketing work: the company needs hardware reasons to hold its price premium over a well-resourced rival.\n\n\"World's smallest smart ring\" sounds definitive and says nothing about whether the health tracking is actually accurate.","[\"oura\",\"wearables\",\"smart-ring\",\"health-tracking\"]","2026-06-04T12:00:00.000Z","2026-06-04T22:15:15.252Z","2026-06-18T04:31:24.857Z",[],[270,271,272,273],"oura","wearables","smart-ring","health-tracking",[275],{"name":276,"url":277},"TechCrunch","https:\u002F\u002Ftechcrunch.com\u002F2026\u002F06\u002F04\u002Foura-ring-5-review-thinner-lighter-better\u002F",{"id":279,"slug":280,"title":281,"dek":282,"body_md":283,"tags_json":284,"published_at":285,"created_at":286,"updated_at":287,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":288,"image_url":289,"persona_id":92,"persona_name":92,"section":13,"tags":290,"sources":294,"feedback":111,"feedback_at":92,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},535,"amazfit-cheetah-2-pro-outperforms-garmin-forerunner-970-in-hyrox-race","Amazfit Wins the Hyrox Wrist Race for $300 Less Than Garmin","The Garmin Forerunner 970's lack of a native Hyrox mode hands the win to the cheaper Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro in a direct race-day comparison.","The $750 running watch lost to the $450 one, because it had never heard of the race.\n\nA side-by-side test during a Hyrox race strapped a Garmin Forerunner 970 and an Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro to opposite wrists for a direct comparison. Hyrox alternates eight 1 km runs with functional exercise stations: sled pushes, rowing, burpee broad jumps, and wall balls. That specific structure exposed a gap in the Garmin. The Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro has a built-in Hyrox mode baked into the workout menu; it knows the race format, flags upcoming stations with on-screen icons, and makes lap transitions feel natural. The Garmin Forerunner 970 has no native equivalent, requiring a third-party app called Roxfit to be installed and configured in advance. A missed setup step meant the watch logged every segment as a running interval, leaving post-race analysis as manual timestamp archaeology against a heart rate graph. The Amazfit's Zepp app, by contrast, generated a clean timeline organized around the race structure automatically.\n\nGarmin's dominance in the running watch market is well-earned, built on deep running dynamics and a long head start on supported activities. But Hyrox is structured enough to punish a one-size-fits-all platform, and the Amazfit's $300 price advantage now has a feature argument behind it. As hybrid race formats grow, \"best running watch\" may need a narrower definition.\n\nOne honest caveat: optical wrist-based heart rate sensors tend to drift when wrist position changes, exactly what happens during sled pushes and rowing, so a chest strap would tighten the data comparison. The Garmin still leads for traditional running. For Hyrox race day, the cheaper watch did more homework.","[\"wearables\",\"fitness\",\"hyrox\",\"garmin\"]","2026-06-02T20:31:04.000Z","2026-06-10T07:25:53.096Z","2026-06-18T08:25:54.356Z",[],"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.xyz.onl\u002Farticle-images\u002Famazfit-cheetah-2-pro-outperforms-garmin-forerunner-970-in-hyrox-race.webp",[271,291,292,293],"fitness","hyrox","garmin",[295],{"name":296,"url":297},"Lifehacker","https:\u002F\u002Flifehacker.com\u002Fhealth\u002Fgarmin-forerunner-970-versus-amazfit-cheetah-during-hyrox-race?utm_medium=RSS",{"id":299,"slug":300,"title":301,"dek":302,"body_md":303,"tags_json":304,"published_at":305,"created_at":306,"updated_at":307,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":308,"image_url":309,"persona_id":92,"persona_name":92,"section":13,"tags":310,"sources":313,"feedback":97,"feedback_at":316,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},145,"hps-600-omnibook-3-leans-into-performance","HP Omnibook 3 Outperforms Apple Where It Counts at $600","HP's new budget laptop beats Apple's comparable option on raw performance, but the interesting question is what HP gave up to get there.","HP's new Omnibook 3 lands at $600 and outperforms Apple's comparable option on raw power - if you're willing to live with whatever HP traded away to get there.\n\nA hands-on review concluded that both Apple and HP make compromises to hit $600, but they make them differently. HP's bet is processing power. The Omnibook 3 delivers more performance than the Apple option at this price, which means something else took the hit - whether that's build materials, display quality, or battery life. The review frames this as a win for HP, though the full accounting of what was sacrificed shapes that verdict considerably.\n\nThe $600 tier is where most real-world buyers actually shop, and it's long been the price point where Windows machines have their clearest argument against the reflexive advice to just save up for a Mac. If the Omnibook 3 holds up on everything besides raw specs, it's a genuine challenge to Apple's value story - and worth noting that Apple doesn't sell any new laptop at this price point at all.\n\nMore performance is a fine pitch for a budget machine, but most $600 laptop buyers open a browser and a spreadsheet, not a workload that stresses a processor. Whether HP made the right trade-offs depends entirely on what it quietly gave up.","[\"laptops\",\"hp\",\"apple\",\"budget\"]","2026-05-29T10:32:00.000Z","2026-05-31T02:27:03.695Z","2026-06-18T02:49:11.478Z",[],"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.xyz.onl\u002Farticle-images\u002Fhps-600-omnibook-3-leans-into-performance.webp",[191,311,172,312],"hp","budget",[314],{"name":216,"url":315},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.wired.com\u002Freview\u002Fhp-omnibook-3\u002F","2026-06-01T02:19:30.945Z",{"id":318,"slug":319,"title":320,"dek":321,"body_md":322,"tags_json":323,"published_at":324,"created_at":325,"updated_at":326,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":327,"image_url":328,"persona_id":92,"persona_name":92,"section":13,"tags":329,"sources":334,"feedback":111,"feedback_at":92,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},134,"audis-2027-rs5-adds-electric-torque-tricks","Audi's 2027 RS5 PHEV Gets an All-New Electric Torque-Vectoring Diff","The 2027 RS5 goes plug-in hybrid with a from-scratch electric torque-vectoring rear differential as its defining piece of new hardware.","Audi's next RS5 is a plug-in hybrid, and its mechanical centerpiece is an entirely new electric torque-vectoring rear differential.\n\nThe 2027 RS5 marks a platform shift for Audi's mid-size performance coupe, moving to a PHEV architecture. The standout addition is a brand-new electric torque-vectoring rear differential developed by Audi. Electric torque vectoring distributes drive between the rear wheels almost instantaneously, with less mechanical lag than traditional limited-slip or hydraulic systems. That combination of instant electric response and combustion output is the core promise of the PHEV format.\n\nThe significance isn't just the hardware. Torque vectoring at this level has historically lived in six-figure sports cars; putting a from-scratch electric system in a production performance coupe signals that electrification is pushing capability downmarket faster than expected. It also gives the RS5 a genuine technical differentiator over rivals, rather than the usual horsepower-and-0-60 spec race.\n\nPHEV performance cars that can't reconcile their two power sources tend to feel like committee decisions. The engineering here is credible. Whether the driving character is, too, is the harder question.","[\"audi\",\"phev\",\"automotive\",\"electric vehicles\"]","2026-05-28T22:01:02.000Z","2026-05-30T08:38:43.018Z","2026-06-18T02:38:10.344Z",[],"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.xyz.onl\u002Farticle-images\u002Faudis-2027-rs5-adds-electric-torque-tricks.webp",[330,331,332,333],"audi","phev","automotive","electric vehicles",[335],{"name":336,"url":337},"Ars Technica","https:\u002F\u002Farstechnica.com\u002Fcars\u002F2026\u002F05\u002F2027-audi-rs5-first-drive-a-performance-phev-with-split-personalities\u002F",{"id":339,"slug":340,"title":341,"dek":342,"body_md":343,"tags_json":344,"published_at":345,"created_at":346,"updated_at":347,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":348,"image_url":349,"persona_id":92,"persona_name":92,"section":13,"tags":350,"sources":354,"feedback":111,"feedback_at":92,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},131,"gopros-mission-1-pro-trades-price-for-sharper-video","GoPro Mission 1 Pro Delivers Top Action Cam Video at a High Price","The Mission 1 Pro's 1-inch sensor delivers 8K at 60fps and 4K at 240fps, putting it at the top of the action cam market with a price to match.","GoPro's Mission 1 Pro is the company's sharpest action camera yet, centered on a 1-inch sensor that pushes 8K video to 60 frames per second.\n\nThe Mission 1 Pro's defining hardware is its sensor. A 1-inch chip is significantly larger than what most action cameras carry, and GoPro says it produces sharp, color-accurate footage as a result. The maximum resolution is 8K at 60 fps; drop to 4K and the camera hits 240 fps for slow-motion capture. The verdict: best-in-class video quality in the action cam category. The catch: the price reflects those ambitions.\n\nThe move to a 1-inch sensor matters because it is a genuine hardware upgrade rather than a software-processed approximation of one. Larger sensors capture more light and detail — harder to replicate with computational tricks, and a real differentiator in a market where most cameras compress similar specs into smaller, cheaper bodies. Whether action camera buyers, who have grown accustomed to capable hardware at moderate prices, will follow GoPro upmarket is the more interesting question.\n\nGoPro has spent years watching competitors close the gap on specs. A 1-inch sensor is the kind of argument that is difficult to copy overnight — assuming enough buyers decide their helmet footage is worth paying for.","[\"gopro\",\"action cameras\",\"video\",\"hardware\"]","2026-05-26T13:10:04.000Z","2026-05-30T04:12:57.823Z","2026-06-18T02:33:26.089Z",[],"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.xyz.onl\u002Farticle-images\u002Fgopros-mission-1-pro-trades-price-for-sharper-video.webp",[351,352,353,39],"gopro","action cameras","video",[355],{"name":356,"url":357},"Engadget","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.engadget.com\u002F2180965\u002Fgopro-mission-1-pro-review\u002F",{"id":359,"slug":360,"title":361,"dek":362,"body_md":363,"tags_json":364,"published_at":365,"created_at":366,"updated_at":367,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":368,"image_url":369,"persona_id":92,"persona_name":92,"section":13,"tags":370,"sources":372,"feedback":97,"feedback_at":375,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},80,"asus-zenbook-a16-review-fast-chip-too-many-compromises","Asus Zenbook A16 Review: Fast Chip, Too Many Compromises","The Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme in Asus's $2,000 laptop posts benchmark numbers that rival desktop PCs, but everything else feels like a tradeoff.","Asus's latest Zenbook A16 runs on Qualcomm's Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme, a chip that posted the highest single-core scores we've seen in a Windows laptop. Multitasking, video exports, and code compiles happen noticeably faster than on Intel or AMD equivalents in this price tier. Everything else — the display, the keyboard, the port selection — lands squarely in \"acceptable but not inspiring.\"\n\nThe real cost isn't the $2,000 MSRP. It's the ecosystem lock-in. Arm-based Windows laptops still struggle with some x86 software, and drivers for niche peripherals remain spotty. If you're a developer or content creator who lives in native Arm apps, the performance gains are real. If you need reliable compatibility with legacy tools, you'll spend more time troubleshooting than working.\n\nThe battery claims don't match real-world use either. Asus advertises all-day life, but our benchmark suite drained the machine in about seven hours — decent, but not the two-day runtime Qualcomm promised. The chassis feels plasticky compared to competing ultrabooks in this price range, and the 16-inch display tops out at 60Hz despite the premium positioning.\n\nThis is a laptop for someone who runs benchmarks for a living and doesn't care about anything else. Everyone else should wait for the software support to catch up.","[\"laptops\",\"chips\",\"ai\",\"hardware\"]","2026-05-03T11:30:00.000Z","2026-05-03T11:49:23.818Z","2026-06-17T23:01:38.628Z",[],"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.xyz.onl\u002Farticle-images\u002Fasus-zenbook-a16-review-fast-chip-too-many-compromises.webp",[191,371,19,39],"chips",[373],{"name":216,"url":374},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.wired.com\u002Freview\u002Fasus-zenbook-a16-2026\u002F","2026-06-01T02:20:26.178Z",{"id":377,"slug":378,"title":379,"dek":380,"body_md":381,"tags_json":382,"published_at":383,"created_at":384,"updated_at":385,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":386,"image_url":387,"persona_id":92,"persona_name":92,"section":13,"tags":388,"sources":390,"feedback":111,"feedback_at":92,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},84,"kitchenaid-refreshes-its-classic-stand-mixer-after-70-years","KitchenAid Refreshes Its Classic Stand Mixer After 70 Years","The iconic appliance maker updated its base-model Artisan mixer for the first time since the 1950s, adding subtle improvements that reviewers say were worth the wait.","KitchenAid has updated its base-model Artisan stand mixer for the first time in over 70 years.\n\nThe Artisan Plus keeps the same iconic design that has sat on countertops since the 1950s but adds a quieter motor, a larger bowl, and a new hinge mechanism. It's the first full overhaul of the company's most popular model. The price went up slightly too, to around $450.\n\nThis is a rare case of a company touching an almost sacred product. KitchenAid sells millions of these mixers, and fans are protective. The changes address long-standing complaints—noise levels and bowl capacity—without messing with the look that made it a kitchen staple. It's iterative innovation on a product that didn't really need fixing, which is arguably the best kind.\n\nThe review notes the new model performs as well as you'd expect, and the quiet motor is genuinely noticeable. But the biggest change might be psychological: knowing that KitchenAid finally listened to decades of feedback, without turning the Artisan into something unrecognizable.","[\"appliances\",\"consumer-tech\",\"hardware\"]","2026-05-03T09:33:00.000Z","2026-05-03T11:49:36.039Z","2026-06-17T23:02:11.532Z",[],"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.xyz.onl\u002Farticle-images\u002Fkitchenaid-refreshes-its-classic-stand-mixer-after-70-years.webp",[389,44,39],"appliances",[391],{"name":216,"url":392},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.wired.com\u002Freview\u002Fkitchenaid-artisan-plus-stand-mixer\u002F",{"id":394,"slug":395,"title":396,"dek":397,"body_md":398,"tags_json":399,"published_at":400,"created_at":401,"updated_at":402,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":403,"image_url":404,"persona_id":92,"persona_name":92,"section":13,"tags":405,"sources":408,"feedback":111,"feedback_at":92,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},85,"coway-updates-its-most-popular-air-purifier","Coway Updates Its Most Popular Air Purifier","The Mighty2 improves looks and cleaning power but skips wheels and an app.","The Coway Airmega Mighty2 is the follow-up to the company's most popular air purifier. It delivers stronger purification performance and a redesigned look that the reviewer calls an improvement over the original. The tradeoffs remain: no wheels for moving it around, and no smartphone app to monitor air quality remotely.\n\nAir purifiers are having a moment as wildfire season and indoor air quality concerns grow across much of the country. The Mighty2 does the core job better than its predecessor—pulling more particles through its filter. That matters when you're trying to clear smoke or allergens from a room.\n\nBut the missing app is worth noting. Even budget gadgets these days come with smartphone connectivity, and Coway's decision to skip it entirely feels less like simplicity and more like a feature left on the cutting room floor. The reviewer wished for both wheels and app controls and came away satisfied anyway—because the air cleaning works.\n\nIf you need app controls, you'll need to look elsewhere. If you just want cleaner air and don't mind moving the unit by hand, the Mighty2 delivers the goods.","[\"hardware\",\"consumer electronics\",\"air quality\"]","2026-05-03T09:01:00.000Z","2026-05-03T11:49:39.399Z","2026-06-17T23:02:19.121Z",[],"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.xyz.onl\u002Farticle-images\u002Fcoway-updates-its-most-popular-air-purifier.webp",[39,406,407],"consumer electronics","air quality",[409],{"name":216,"url":410},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.wired.com\u002Freview\u002Fcoway-airmega-mighty2\u002F",{"id":412,"slug":413,"title":414,"dek":415,"body_md":416,"tags_json":417,"published_at":418,"created_at":419,"updated_at":420,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":421,"image_url":422,"persona_id":92,"persona_name":92,"section":13,"tags":423,"sources":427,"feedback":111,"feedback_at":92,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},91,"tovala-expands-to-family-meals-the-salt-problem-remains","Tovala Expands to Family Meals. The Salt Problem Remains","The smart-oven meal kit now offers family portions, but reviewers say the sodium levels are concerning.","Tovala now serves four people instead of one or two.\n\nThe company, which sells both a smart oven and a accompanying meal kit, launched family-sized meal options this week. Reviewers at Wired found the food \"good\" — the oven cooks evenly, the meals are relatively convenient, and the portions finally work for a family. But the sodium content is, in their words, \"lord, the salt.\" Some meals reportedly exceed a full day's recommended sodium intake per serving.\n\nThis matters because Tovala occupies a weird niche in the meal kit space — you're buying into their hardware ecosystem, not just their food. The family meals make the proposition more viable for households that weren't being served. But the sodium issue isn't new to meal kits, and Tovala isn't doing anything to fix it. If you're already worried about processed food's health impacts, this won't ease your mind.\n\nThe real question is whether convenience justifies the trade-off — and whether Tovala will eventually face the same regulatory scrutiny that has plagued other high-sodium food products.","[\"foodtech\",\"consumer\",\"health\",\"hardware\"]","2026-05-02T13:33:00.000Z","2026-05-03T11:50:00.786Z","2026-06-17T23:03:07.670Z",[],"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.xyz.onl\u002Farticle-images\u002Ftovala-expands-to-family-meals-the-salt-problem-remains.webp",[424,425,426,39],"foodtech","consumer","health",[428],{"name":216,"url":429},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.wired.com\u002Freview\u002Ftovala-oven-meal-kit-review-2026\u002F",{"id":431,"slug":432,"title":433,"dek":434,"body_md":435,"tags_json":436,"published_at":437,"created_at":438,"updated_at":439,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":440,"image_url":441,"persona_id":92,"persona_name":92,"section":13,"tags":442,"sources":446,"feedback":111,"feedback_at":92,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},95,"review-airpods-max-2-still-best-for-iphone-users","Review: AirPods Max 2 Still Best for iPhone Users","A new review confirms Apple's premium headphones remain the top over-ear option for iOS users — but the competition is catching up.","Apple's AirPods Max 2 remain the best over-ear headphones for iPhone owners, according to a fresh review. The second-generation model earns praise for sound quality, active noise cancellation, and seamless integration with the Apple ecosystem — the same formula that made the originals popular.\n\nThe review notes the headphones excel at iOS-specific features like automatic device switching, Spatial Audio, and Find My integration. These perks only work with Apple hardware, which is the point. For users deep in Apple's ecosystem, there's simply no over-ear competitor that matches this level of cohesion.\n\nWhy it matters: Apple essentially owns the premium over-ear market for iOS users. The $549 price tag is steep, but buyers are paying for the ecosystem lock-in as much as the audio performance. Rival headphones from Sony, Bose, and others offer comparable or better sound at lower prices — but they can't replicate the one-tap pairing and handoff between iPhone, iPad, and Mac.\n\nThe Max 2 represent a refinement rather than a revolution. That's typical Apple: iterate on a winning formula rather than reinvent. For iPhone users willing to spend $549 on headphones, the choice remains obvious.","[\"apple\",\"airpods\",\"review\",\"headphones\"]","2026-05-02T10:14:00.000Z","2026-05-03T11:50:14.129Z","2026-06-17T23:03:40.073Z",[],"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.xyz.onl\u002Farticle-images\u002Freview-airpods-max-2-still-best-for-iphone-users.webp",[172,443,444,445],"airpods","review","headphones",[447],{"name":216,"url":448},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.wired.com\u002Freview\u002Fapple-airpods-max-2\u002F",{"id":450,"slug":451,"title":452,"dek":453,"body_md":454,"tags_json":455,"published_at":456,"created_at":457,"updated_at":458,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":459,"image_url":92,"persona_id":92,"persona_name":92,"section":13,"tags":460,"sources":464,"feedback":111,"feedback_at":92,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},119,"aluminum-luggage-is-still-a-thing-is-it-worth-it","Aluminum Luggage Is Still a Thing. Is It Worth It?","Premium all-metal carry-ons now cost as much as flights themselves — and people are still buying them.","Aluminum luggage is back, somehow.\n\nThe all-metal carry-on market is thriving in 2026. Brands like Rimowa, Away, and Carl Friedrik continue to sell aluminum cases for $1,000 or more, and the turn-left-on-a-plane aesthetic remains as divisive as ever. These suitcases are heavy — literally — weighing significantly more than their polycarbonate counterparts. They dent. They scratch. They require more care than a standard carry-on. And yet, the appeal persists.\n\nHere is what you are actually paying for: a specific look. The aluminum shell signals something to the person sitting across from you in the boarding area. Whether that signal is \"I have money to burn\" or \"I take this very seriously\" depends on your generosity of interpretation. The functional benefits are thin. Aluminum provides no meaningful protection over high-quality hard-shell plastic. It is not lighter. It is not easier to maneuver.\n\nWhat is new in 2026 is less the product and more the pricing confidence. Manufacturers have held the line on premium pricing even as inflation has eased elsewhere. A carry-on that costs as much as a round-trip domestic ticket is now normal in this niche. The market has accepted it.\n\nThe skeptical view is this: if you need your luggage to make a statement, the aluminum carry-on delivers. If you need your luggage to get from Point A to Point B without drama, there is no rational reason to spend four figures on a box with wheels.","[\"luxury\",\"consumer\",\"lifestyle\",\"tech\"]","2026-05-01T10:30:00.000Z","2026-05-03T11:51:30.913Z","2026-06-17T23:06:50.361Z",[],[461,425,462,463],"luxury","lifestyle","tech",[465],{"name":216,"url":466},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.wired.com\u002Fstory\u002Fdo-you-need-aluminum-luggage\u002F",{"id":468,"slug":469,"title":470,"dek":471,"body_md":472,"tags_json":473,"published_at":474,"created_at":475,"updated_at":476,"status":91,"review_note":92,"review_notes":477,"image_url":92,"persona_id":92,"persona_name":92,"section":13,"tags":478,"sources":479,"feedback":111,"feedback_at":92,"cost_usd":111,"total_tokens":111},120,"ankers-new-portable-projector-is-water-resistant-and-200","Anker's New Portable Projector Is Water-Resistant and $200","The Soundcore Nebula P1 bridges the gap between backyard movie nights and conference room presentations—at a fraction of the cost of premium projectors.","Anker's latest portable projector can survive a splash.\n\nWired reviewed the Soundcore Nebula P1, a $200 projector designed for both indoor and outdoor use. It's compact enough to fit in a backpack and carries an IPX5 water-resistance rating, meaning it can handle rain or poolside splashes. The projector runs Android TV, has built-in speakers, and outputs 1080p resolution. However, the review notes it's not suitable for serious home theater use—brightness and color accuracy fall short of cinema standards.\n\nThis fills a gap in the market for people who want a projector they can actually take outside without worrying about weather or damage. At $200, it's significantly cheaper than most portable projectors with any water resistance. But buyers should manage expectations—this is a casual viewing device, not a replacement for a dedicated home theater setup.\n\nIf you're hosting a backyard movie night or need something for client presentations on the go, this fits those use cases well—just don't expect to replace your living room TV.","[\"hardware\",\"consumer electronics\",\"reviews\"]","2026-05-01T10:03:00.000Z","2026-05-03T11:51:35.121Z","2026-06-17T23:06:58.308Z",[],[39,406,13],[480],{"name":216,"url":481},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.wired.com\u002Freview\u002Fsoundcore-nebula-p1\u002F",{"sections":483},[484,485,486,487,488,489,490,491,492,493,494,495,496,497],{"name":18,"slug":19,"count":20,"latest_published_at":21},{"name":23,"slug":24,"count":25,"latest_published_at":26},{"name":28,"slug":29,"count":30,"latest_published_at":31},{"name":33,"slug":34,"count":35,"latest_published_at":36},{"name":38,"slug":39,"count":40,"latest_published_at":41},{"name":43,"slug":44,"count":45,"latest_published_at":46},{"name":48,"slug":49,"count":50,"latest_published_at":51},{"name":53,"slug":54,"count":55,"latest_published_at":56},{"name":58,"slug":59,"count":60,"latest_published_at":61},{"name":63,"slug":64,"count":65,"latest_published_at":66},{"name":68,"slug":69,"count":65,"latest_published_at":70},{"name":72,"slug":73,"count":74,"latest_published_at":75},{"name":12,"slug":13,"count":14,"latest_published_at":15},{"name":77,"slug":78,"count":79,"latest_published_at":80}]