[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"branding":3,"analytics":7,"article-radio-astronomers-push-back-on-spacexs-100000-satellite-plan":10,"sections":35},{"siteName":4,"siteTagline":5,"publisherName":4,"contactEmail":6},"The Revision","Tech news, decoded.","editor@therevision.news",{"gaMeasurementId":8,"adsenseClientId":9},"G-ZW2MV82GYR","ca-pub-8533917693782264",{"article":11},{"id":12,"slug":13,"title":14,"dek":15,"body_md":16,"tags_json":17,"published_at":18,"created_at":19,"updated_at":20,"status":21,"review_note":22,"review_notes":23,"image_url":22,"persona_id":22,"persona_name":22,"section":24,"tags":25,"sources":30,"feedback":34,"feedback_at":22,"cost_usd":34,"total_tokens":34},11641,"radio-astronomers-push-back-on-spacexs-100000-satellite-plan","Radio Astronomers Push Back on SpaceX's 100,000-Satellite Plan","The National Radio Astronomy Observatory wants the FCC to scrap SpaceX's bid for a 100,000-satellite Starlink upgrade, citing interference risks to telescopes.","A federally funded astronomy lab wants regulators to kill SpaceX's next Starlink expansion outright.\n\nThe National Radio Astronomy Observatory has formally opposed SpaceX's application for a third-generation Starlink constellation of up to 100,000 satellites. NRAO's filing does not request tweaks, spectrum-sharing terms, or brightness limits. It asks that the application be withdrawn entirely. That is a flat rejection, not a negotiating position.\n\nRadio telescopes are built to detect extremely faint signals, so interference invisible to everyday technology can blind an instrument outright. A constellation this size would be a wholesale change to the radio environment those telescopes depend on, not a marginal addition to the sky. NRAO's all-or-nothing stance suggests it sees no engineering fix, only a deployment that should not happen as proposed.\n\nIt is a blunt opening position from a government lab against a satellite fleet SpaceX has not yet built, and it puts the FCC in the position of weighing basic science against broadband ambition at a scale neither side can fully test in advance.","[\"starlink\",\"spacex\",\"radio-astronomy\",\"satellites\"]","2026-10-14T17:17:20.000Z","2026-10-14T20:20:04.527Z","2026-10-14T20:20:09.137Z","published",null,[],"policy",[26,27,28,29],"starlink","spacex","radio-astronomy","satellites",[31],{"name":32,"url":33},"PCMag","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.pcmag.com\u002Fnews\u002Fstarlinks-gen-3-system-faces-opposition-from-radio-astronomers",0,{"sections":36},[37,42,47,51,56,61,66,71,76,81,86,91,96,101],{"name":38,"slug":39,"count":40,"latest_published_at":41},"AI","ai",7012,"2026-10-14T22:53:31.000Z",{"name":43,"slug":44,"count":45,"latest_published_at":46},"Security","security",993,"2026-10-14T20:03:43.000Z",{"name":48,"slug":24,"count":49,"latest_published_at":50},"Policy",524,"2026-10-14T22:03:31.000Z",{"name":52,"slug":53,"count":54,"latest_published_at":55},"Deals","deals",513,"2026-10-14T17:24:42.000Z",{"name":57,"slug":58,"count":59,"latest_published_at":60},"Hardware","hardware",256,"2026-10-14T16:03:09.000Z",{"name":62,"slug":63,"count":64,"latest_published_at":65},"Consumer Tech","consumer-tech",226,"2026-10-14T22:00:02.000Z",{"name":67,"slug":68,"count":69,"latest_published_at":70},"Science","science",201,"2026-10-13T23:13:31.000Z",{"name":72,"slug":73,"count":74,"latest_published_at":75},"Startups","startups",133,"2026-10-14T19:51:34.000Z",{"name":77,"slug":78,"count":79,"latest_published_at":80},"Software","software",125,"2026-10-14T22:23:48.000Z",{"name":82,"slug":83,"count":84,"latest_published_at":85},"Dev Tools","dev-tools",116,"2026-10-13T16:20:18.000Z",{"name":87,"slug":88,"count":89,"latest_published_at":90},"General","general",79,"2026-10-14T18:09:38.000Z",{"name":92,"slug":93,"count":94,"latest_published_at":95},"Gaming","gaming",74,"2026-10-14T19:40:59.000Z",{"name":97,"slug":98,"count":99,"latest_published_at":100},"Reviews","reviews",37,"2026-10-14T10:00:00.000Z",{"name":102,"slug":103,"count":104,"latest_published_at":105},"How-To","how-to",8,"2026-10-05T09:00:00.000Z"]