[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"branding":3,"analytics":7,"article-google-revises-privacy-policy-on-gmail-and-photos-ad-targeting":10,"sections":63},{"siteName":4,"siteTagline":5,"publisherName":4,"contactEmail":6},"The Revision","Tech news, decoded.","editor@therevision.news",{"gaMeasurementId":8,"adsenseClientId":9},"G-ZW2MV82GYR","ca-pub-8533917693782264",{"article":11},{"id":12,"slug":13,"title":14,"dek":15,"body_md":16,"tags_json":17,"published_at":18,"created_at":19,"updated_at":20,"status":21,"review_note":22,"review_notes":23,"image_url":42,"persona_id":42,"persona_name":42,"section":43,"tags":44,"sources":49,"feedback":62,"feedback_at":42,"cost_usd":62,"total_tokens":62},12306,"google-revises-privacy-policy-on-gmail-and-photos-ad-targeting","Google Revises Privacy Policy on Gmail and Photos Ad Targeting","A new exception lets Google use Drive, Gmail and Photos data for ad personalization when users link them to its AI and Search tools.","Google has changed its privacy policy so that data from Drive, Gmail and Google Photos can be used for personalized ads, but only if you connect those services to its AI features.\n\nThe previous policy said Google would not use content from those three services for ad personalization, full stop. As of October 16, the text adds a condition: the promise holds \"unless you choose to make data from these services available to other Google services that support personalized ads.\" In practice, that covers users who link Drive, Gmail or Photos to AI Mode and other Search tools.\n\nThe key word is \"choose.\" Google is framing this as an opt-in, and the old blanket pledge still applies to anyone who never connects their accounts. That is a real distinction. It is also a narrower one than it sounds, because the exception points to \"other Google services that support personalized ads,\" a category the policy language does not limit to a short list. Search is where Google earns most of its money, so a Search feature fed by your inbox sits very close to an ad system.\n\nThe change fits a pattern across the industry. AI assistants work better the more they know about you, and companies that sell advertising have an obvious interest in what that knowledge reveals. Meta has already moved toward using AI chat interactions to shape the ads people see. Google's version starts from a different place, a decades-old promise about email and photos, which makes the edit to that promise more notable than the feature itself.\n\nWhat remains unclear is how visible the trade-off will be at the moment of connection. A policy footnote and a clear consent screen are very different things, and users will mostly meet the second.","[\"google\",\"privacy\",\"advertising\",\"ai\"]","2026-10-23T16:52:55.000Z","2026-10-23T18:07:28.303Z","2026-11-08T00:07:45.140Z","published","The process-note language and the unsourced 2017 Gmail claim are gone, but the draft still has unsupported claims: \"a decades-old promise about email and photos\" is wrong because Photos and the Gmail ad pledge are not decades old, and the Meta line about using AI chat interactions for ads is not in the source and has no attribution or specifics. Fix or remove both, say that Android Authority spotted the change, and make clear that calling it an \"opt-in\" is your reading of the word \"choose\" rathe",[24,30,34,38],{"id":25,"reviewer":26,"round":27,"reason":28,"status":29},"editor-r1","editor",1,"The draft reads as if it was written from a truncated source: it hedges with 'as quoted' and 'the quoted language' and ends on 'The policy as quoted does not say,' which is a disclaimer about sourcing rather than a reader-facing conclusion. Rewrite it to state only what the source supports (the October 16 change, the added exception clause, and that it covers Drive, Gmail and Photos connected to AI Mode and other Search tools). Credit Android Authority for spotting the change, drop or clearly so","resolved",{"id":31,"reviewer":26,"round":32,"reason":33,"status":29},"editor-r2",2,"Remove or soften the claims the source doesn't support: the assertion that 'the policy text gives the reader no list' of services (the source excerpt is truncated and never says this), the line about 'how those features are classed as ad-supporting services', and the flat statement that the pledge holds 'only as long as you leave the connections off' (the source says Google 'might' use the data, so use hedged wording like that in the dek and body). Keep the otherwise clean structure and the read",{"id":35,"reviewer":26,"round":36,"reason":37,"status":29},"editor-r3",3,"Delete the process-note language that exposes a truncated source ('According to the source...', 'The excerpt we have cuts off there, so the full list of affected services is not something we can confirm') and state only what the policy change says (users who connect Drive, Gmail or Photos to AI Mode and other Search tools); also attribute or drop the unsourced 2017 Gmail-scanning claim.",{"id":39,"reviewer":26,"round":40,"reason":22,"status":41},"editor-r4",4,"open",null,"policy",[45,46,47,48],"google","privacy","advertising","ai",[50,53,56,59],{"name":51,"url":52},"The Verge","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.theverge.com\u002Ftech\u002F1017600\u002Fgoogle-personal-intelligence-privacy-policy-ads-update",{"name":54,"url":55},"Ars Technica","https:\u002F\u002Farstechnica.com\u002Fgadgets\u002F2026\u002F10\u002Fupdated-google-privacy-policy-says-your-gmail-might-be-used-for-advertising\u002F",{"name":57,"url":58},"The Next Web","https:\u002F\u002Fthenextweb.com\u002Fnews\u002Fgoogle-privacy-policy-gmail-photos-ads-personal-intelligence",{"name":60,"url":61},"Lifehacker","https:\u002F\u002Flifehacker.com\u002Ftech\u002Fgoogle-may-use-data-from-gmail-in-personal-intelligence-opt-out?utm_medium=RSS",0,{"sections":64},[65,69,74,79,83,88,93,98,103,108,113,118,123,128],{"name":66,"slug":48,"count":67,"latest_published_at":68},"AI",7110,"2026-11-08T14:34:09.000Z",{"name":70,"slug":71,"count":72,"latest_published_at":73},"Security","security",1099,"2026-11-08T15:24:01.000Z",{"name":75,"slug":76,"count":77,"latest_published_at":78},"Deals","deals",620,"2026-11-08T08:00:00.000Z",{"name":80,"slug":43,"count":81,"latest_published_at":82},"Policy",604,"2026-11-07T15:48:26.000Z",{"name":84,"slug":85,"count":86,"latest_published_at":87},"Consumer Tech","consumer-tech",336,"2026-11-08T21:00:00.000Z",{"name":89,"slug":90,"count":91,"latest_published_at":92},"Hardware","hardware",316,"2026-11-08T14:36:39.000Z",{"name":94,"slug":95,"count":96,"latest_published_at":97},"Science","science",222,"2026-11-07T16:19:17.000Z",{"name":99,"slug":100,"count":101,"latest_published_at":102},"Software","software",154,"2026-11-08T15:42:52.000Z",{"name":104,"slug":105,"count":106,"latest_published_at":107},"Startups","startups",150,"2026-11-06T16:50:01.000Z",{"name":109,"slug":110,"count":111,"latest_published_at":112},"Dev Tools","dev-tools",125,"2026-11-06T22:15:59.000Z",{"name":114,"slug":115,"count":116,"latest_published_at":117},"General","general",111,"2026-11-08T21:27:29.000Z",{"name":119,"slug":120,"count":121,"latest_published_at":122},"Gaming","gaming",94,"2026-11-08T20:52:05.000Z",{"name":124,"slug":125,"count":126,"latest_published_at":127},"Reviews","reviews",38,"2026-10-20T12:00:00.000Z",{"name":129,"slug":130,"count":131,"latest_published_at":132},"How-To","how-to",8,"2026-10-05T09:00:00.000Z"]