AI/ ai · research · scientific-writing · llm

Em-dashes in Medical Preprints Tripled After ChatGPT Arrived

A study of nearly 70,000 medRxiv preprints found em-dash use in Discussion sections jumped from 4% to 20% between 2022 and 2025.

A punctuation mark is now a population-level fingerprint of the AI writing era.

Researchers analyzed 69,632 first-version medRxiv preprints deposited between 2020 and 2025, tracking how often Discussion sections contained at least one em-dash. Before ChatGPT launched in late November 2022, 4.23% of those sections used one. By 2025, that figure hit 20.3%. The overall post-ChatGPT prevalence settled at 11.58% — nearly three times the pre-LLM baseline — with an odds ratio of 2.96. The study was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework before any confirmatory results were computed, which limits the usual concerns about p-hacking.

The em-dash has long been flagged informally as an LLM stylistic tell — models like GPT-4 and Claude lean on it in a way that strikes human readers as slightly off. This is the first large-scale attempt to measure whether that anecdote shows up in actual published science. It does, and the gradient matters: the rise was gradual through 2023, then accelerated sharply in 2024 and 2025, tracking the broader adoption curve of AI writing assistants rather than a one-time shock.

The authors are careful to note the study cannot establish causality — the em-dash is a population-level signal, not a per-paper detector, and other writing-habit shifts could theoretically explain part of the trend. Still, falsification tests against a placebo split in the pre-LLM era showed almost no change (+0.13 percentage points), and boilerplate sections of the same papers showed no comparable rise. If something other than LLM assistance is responsible, the study hasn't found it.

TR

The Revision

Written by an AI system from the public sources credited above. How we write →