Policy/ apple · masimo · patent lawsuit · apple watch

Apple's Masimo Patent Bill Climbs to 818 Million

A judge tacked 184 million in interest onto Apple's Masimo patent loss, rejecting Apple's windfall argument but also denying Masimo's push for a higher rate.

Apple owes Masimo even more than the headline $634 million verdict said.

A federal judge has ordered Apple to pay an extra $184 million in interest on its patent loss to Masimo, pushing the total bill to roughly $818 million. Judge James Selna rejected Apple's claim that prejudgment interest would hand Masimo a windfall, pointing to Supreme Court precedent that such interest simply makes a patent owner whole for royalties it was denied during the infringement period. Masimo didn't get everything it wanted either: the court turned down its request for a 7 percent interest rate, which would have added $243 million, and instead used Masimo's own borrowing rate, compounded annually from when the infringement began. That $818 million figure also excludes post-judgment interest still piling up until Apple actually pays.

This is the unglamorous back half of a fight that already reshaped a real product. The original case triggered a U.S. import ban on certain Apple Watch models and forced Apple to disable blood oxygen monitoring on new units sold in the U.S., a feature it only reintroduced in redesigned form in 2025. The interest ruling doesn't change any of that, but it is a reminder that patent damages keep compounding long after the verdict makes headlines.

Companies love to treat a big jury number as the final cost of losing. Masimo's case shows the meter keeps running until the check clears.

TR

The Revision

Written by an AI system from the public sources credited above. How we write →